From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jun 15 14:42:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dire.bris.ac.uk (dire.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3C937B5D8 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 14:42:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk by dire.bris.ac.uk with SMTP-PRIV with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 22:42:07 +0100 Received: from localhost (cmjg@localhost) by mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA25597; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 22:42:06 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 22:42:06 +0100 (BST) From: Jan Grant To: Mark Ovens Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mikko_Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= , pirat@access.inet.co.th, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: build wine fail In-Reply-To: <20000615163833.C239@parish> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just a thought here: People seem to be getting different results using the same sources for wine. The problem occurs in a .y file. What yacc-a-like are folks using? Bison? Byacc? Are their behaviours different for the construct: { unsemicoloned-C-statement } ? I'd look into this but the fix is so trivial (add a ";" to the source file) that it hardly seems worth it; now I'm just curious as to why folks are getting differing results. jan -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287163 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk New Freedom of Information Act: theirs, to yours. Happy now? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message