From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 13 09:31:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6109716A403; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:31:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru) Received: from pobox.codelabs.ru (pobox.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E7613C465; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:31:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru) Received: from codelabs.ru (pobox.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.45]) by pobox.codelabs.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) id 1HR3M7-000PRD-Iv; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:31:43 +0300 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 12:31:38 +0300 From: Eygene Ryabinkin To: Roman Kurakin Message-ID: <20070313093137.GP58523@codelabs.ru> References: <20070304160613.GN80319@codelabs.ru> <45EB4915.1090703@FreeBSD.org> <20070305145647.GT80319@codelabs.ru> <45EC3EFD.3000301@FreeBSD.org> <20070306073945.GR57456@codelabs.ru> <45ED900A.7050208@FreeBSD.org> <20070312092406.GJ58523@codelabs.ru> <45F51F2B.5020906@FreeBSD.org> <20070312121117.GQ58523@codelabs.ru> <45F5520B.80709@inse.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45F5520B.80709@inse.ru> Sender: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_50 Cc: rik@FreeBSD.org, andre@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, glebius@FreeBSD.org, thompsa@FreeBSD.org, "Bruce M. Simpson" Subject: Re: kern/109815: wrong interface identifier at pfil_hooks for vlans + if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:31:50 -0000 > Here it is. I'll check it for compilation this evening and I hope Eygene will > be able to put it in a production for testings. The system with 6.2 and this patch is living since yesterday. No problems were spotted. I will try to put this patch into another, busier system, but this will not be the same patch: my own one will be applied on top of it. So this will not be the clear testcase. -- Eygene