From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 20:07:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCB216A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:07:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.aheyn.com (lifestylecomm.com [66.9.27.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D52443D1F for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:07:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aheyn@lifestylecomm.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.aheyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA4E181464 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:08:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.aheyn.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lifestylecomm.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 51321-08 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:08:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from AREILLPC (ns.jmsent.com [66.9.27.146]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.aheyn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003BB181468 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:08:27 -0500 (EST) From: "Andrew Heyn" To: Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:07:00 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20050329192310.69975.qmail@web81201.mail.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lifestylecomm.com Subject: RE: ATI RAGE Mobility X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:07:11 -0000 I would like to state that at one point, I did get this to work. This was also a long time ago, when the patches mentioned in some of the proceeding links had to be done.. (which were and probably still are XFree86 specific) http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/news.html http://am-productions.biz/docs/fujitsu-p2110.php leads to http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Building I noticed that I had to make sure I rebuilt mach64.ko and some of the X libraries regarding dri if I was to upgrade the kernel. Note this from the Wiki: "The DRM is shipped with the kernel, so you shouldn't need to build it. If you choose to, simply run "make && make install" from the drm/bsd directory. " This is contrary to the suggestion to install "ports/graphics/drm." The building referred to above is within the X tree. The history to the mach64 dri support may be of interest: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/news.html (already gave this link) You can always (if you are patient) contact anholt who is rather busy on freenode.net in #dri. Beware, I asked a question there, and fixed it myself before I got an answer. Hope this helps more than my other post. It still sucked pretty bad once I got DRI working with my mach64, but... It was better... Thanks! Andrew -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Mark Busby Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 11:23 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: re: ATI RAGE Mobility On Monday 28 March 2005 20:25, Edwin Mons wrote: > On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:20:50 +0200, Edwin Mons wrote: > > I'm trying to enable DRI on my IBM ThinkPad A20m, which has an ATI > > Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x rev 100 GPU onboard. I succesfully > > installed the mach64 DRM module, which shows the following lines in> > my dmesg: > > > > drm0: port 0x2000-0x20ff mem > > 0xf4200000-0xf4200fff,0xf5000000-0xf5ffffff irq 11 at device 0.0 on > > pci1 > > info: [drm] AGP at 0xf8000000 64MB > > info: [drm] Initialized mach64 1.0.0 20020904 on minor 0 > > > > However, when I start X.org 6.8.2, it doesn't show anything about > > DRM in the logfiles (attached). glxinfo reports it doesn't use > > Direct Rendering as well. > > > > Attached is my xorg.conf, as well. > > > > My questions: 1) does anybody know if it is possible to have DRI on > > this configuration at all, and 2) how does one get it to work? from kernel LINT file # DRM options: # mgadrm: AGP Matrox G200, G400, G450, G550 # tdfxdrm: 3dfx Voodoo 3/4/5 and Banshee # r128drm: ATI Rage 128 # radeondrm: ATI Radeon up to 9000/9100 # DRM_DEBUG: include debug printfs, very slow # # mga requires AGP in the kernel, and it is recommended # for AGP r128 and radeon cards. device mgadrm device "r128drm" device radeondrm device tdfxdrm options DRM_DEBUG You may need to add the "device mgadrm" Hope it helps. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"