From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 22 17:05:54 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BD516A419 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from minimarmot@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B7D13C457 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:05:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from minimarmot@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so943787rvb for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:05:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=50dp6ZZgJnAieiIAqYKtOyyqo7wp1HCIiesrbEBmWIw=; b=dDpm3doM1AoBdBJUpSJ9HeMqNBUWvfPl1atWT6Wh7rwnJol0HgjuliXF/IkAdXv6ScoQwIjG3hi6G7VsdNpWFaDEsT8UhSen40Cf/U5H7kX1roglb5V6Y+incz4ky/DyAoUf5zaG1UWx6U7eMmnyNGVUaa/xQtDDg5fimULYzGg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sl8fzZUQ8X1XXO9MN1hibLilkBm9qtZ6CbYbIe48Y773RR65Ln5bsFZph755hXotI7cm8MS51pKQTUuHJzZNeLZyp7+qfonqu8AxHZu85m4oStg4130RlLewjy5ZL6QiclOOgcU/kiWsVxSdSrTvjn/wSVGD8brxBh9rzrmSc2I= Received: by 10.142.214.5 with SMTP id m5mr885549wfg.1190480753540; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:05:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.14.9 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:05:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <47d0403c0709221005t4a13f32bt9c56b5ef98283290@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:05:53 +0000 From: "Ben Kaduk" To: "Dmitry Morozovsky" In-Reply-To: <20070922205156.K70319@woozle.rinet.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47d0403c0709211213n50988b33u2b9bdd15475bfcdd@mail.gmail.com> <1217454532.20070922005116@rulez.sk> <46F541FD.8040807@freebsd.org> <47d0403c0709220946q323af62ah1c4565b31f2677a@mail.gmail.com> <20070922205156.K70319@woozle.rinet.ru> Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" , freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sgml entities for CPU architectures? X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:05:54 -0000 On 9/22/07, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, Ben Kaduk wrote: > > BK> > >> I'm updating my patch to the FAQ (docs/115000) for danger@'s > BK> > >> (somewhat) new daily snapshot > BK> > >> builds, which are specific to x86 and amd64. Should I just use literals for > BK> > >> these architectures, or are the entity-ified somewhere that I haven't found yet? [snip] > I can see in share/sgml/freebsd.ent: > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is from rev 1.93 of freebsd.ent: > > date: 2007/08/11 19:17:41; author: bmah; state: Exp; lines: +15 -0 > Add &arch.*; entities for the various architectures. These > should only be used when referring to a version of FreeBSD on > a specific architecture, e.g. &os;/&arch.i386;. Use other, > already existing entities (such as &i386;) when talking generically > about an architecture, in order to attribute trademarks correctly. > > Thanks, Dmitry. These seem reasonable to describe danger@'s daily builds of FreeBSD-i386 and FreeBSD-amd64. I'm just surprised that I didn't see them before; I thought I looked in share/sgml/ -Ben Kaduk