From owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 19 20:59:30 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719CB16A47B
	for <freebsd-qa@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:59:30 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jari.aalto@cante.net)
Received: from fep32-app.kolumbus.fi (fep32-0.kolumbus.fi [193.229.0.63])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E6443D6B
	for <freebsd-qa@freebsd.org>; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:59:27 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jari.aalto@cante.net)
Received: from bongo.cante.net ([81.197.0.130]) by fep32-app.kolumbus.fi
	with ESMTP
	id <20060619205925.TIRX28725.fep32-app.kolumbus.fi@bongo.cante.net>;
	Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:59:25 +0300
Received: from fw.cante.net ([192.168.1.3] helo=cante)
	by bongo.cante.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.62) (envelope-from <jari.aalto@cante.net>)
	id 1FsQpi-0002AC-J7; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:58:54 +0300
Received: from jaalto by cante with local (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <jaalto@cante.cante.net>)
	id 1FsQpg-0002x9-8H; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:58:52 +0300
To: pkg-shadow-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
References: <20060509153807.16297.97467.reportbug@cante>
	<E1FsDxt-0001DV-Nv@cante>
Message-Id: <E1FsQpg-0002x9-8H@cante>
From: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:58:52 +0300
Cc: 366541-quiet@bugs.debian.org, freebsd-qa@freebsd.org, bubulle@debian.org,
	mstone@debian.org, 366545-quiet@bugs.debian.org,
	366546-quiet@bugs.debian.org, anibal@debian.org
Subject: Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
X-BeenThere: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD Quality Assurance <freebsd-qa.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-qa>,
	<mailto:freebsd-qa-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-qa>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-qa@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-qa-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-qa>,
	<mailto:freebsd-qa-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:59:30 -0000

| > To Shadow list: please consider moving:
| >
| >   /usr/bin/nologin   -> /bin/nologin
| >
| > so that other packages could start using 'nologin' instead of current
| > /bin/false.
| 
| This seems fair by me. I wonder whether this should deserve a
| transition or just move the binary....After all, nologin is not here
| since a long time so it's pretty unlikely that many packages use it
| (for instance to define it as some created users shell).
| 
| I'm tempted to avoid a complicated transition. Advices?

I've CC'd packages where I've been advogating nologin in Debian. The
binary is not yet widely used, so just move it so that we can get full
potential of nologin to forthcoming etch.
 
| I think that this suggestion should go to upstream as well. Having
| nologin in /bin does not make sense only for Debian, of course.
| 
| Tomasz?

Than would be FreeBSD devel list. I'm not sure which list, but I've
added CC to:

    freebsd-qa@freebsd.org
 
| Jari, I'm OK with you cloning this bug report and reassign a "please
| move nologin to /bin" bug to login.

created new one.

  http://bugs.debian.org/374525

Thanks,
Jari