Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:45:41 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@rocketmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Two pf questions Message-ID: <20170328114541.0ca0d084@archlinux.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20170328113501.2a5ebf60@archlinux.localdomain> References: <CAPORhP4JA_Jak7fL8Ko7wwoxGob=qLDzPLxtTgekoumqQJEGmA@mail.gmail.com> <20170327170941.59c84eec@archlinux.localdomain> <20170327171959.405bbfbb@archlinux.localdomain> <CALfReyfFyj9Gh1Yy%2BzxWH1kAgq%2BkVAGPpjG92keGWAaoMLNSQg@mail.gmail.com> <20170328111655.121ede18@archlinux.localdomain> <20170328111959.400d4761@archlinux.localdomain> <20170328113501.2a5ebf60@archlinux.localdomain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:35:01 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:19:59 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via freebsd-questions >wrote: >>cp /etc/pf/bruteforce /tmp/foobar.txt >>pfctl -t bruteforce -T show >> /tmp/foobar.txt >>sort -u /tmp/foobar.txt > /etc/pf/bruteforce >> >>^ >>^ >> >>>If so, the above example with "sort -u" still might be good. >>>Perhaps >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the above with the cp to a backup file >> >>>in addition within a loop until the exit status $? of the last >>>command is 0, to ensure that /etc/pf/bruteforcen doesn't get lost, if >>>something should went wrong. > >More clear, something similar to this: > >cp /etc/pf/bruteforce /tmp/foobar.txt && \ >pfctl -t bruteforce -T show >> /tmp/foobar.txt && \ >some_loop > sort -u /tmp/foobar.txt > /etc/pf/bruteforce > check_exit_status >some_loop My apologies, it's not my day today ;). I don't know if the exit status available after sort -u /tmp/foobar.txt > /etc/pf/bruteforce is from "sort" and/or ">", at least sort -u /tmp/foobar.txt | tee /etc/pf/bruteforce ensures that it's the status returned from "tee", but I suspect ">" works, too.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170328114541.0ca0d084>