From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 17 17:38:06 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00ABCA68
 for <freebsd-net@hub.freebsd.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 17:38:05 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFA68E1D
 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 17:38:05 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t5HHc51v071173
 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 17:38:05 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 200379] SCTP stack is not FIB aware
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 17:38:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: kern
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-200379-2472-0T8cT4O8Fx@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-200379-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-200379-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 17:38:06 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200379

--- Comment #16 from Michael Tuexen <tuexen@freebsd.org> ---
(In reply to Alan Somers from comment #15)
Yes, you can failover from one ISP to another. Currently this is done by having
corresponding entries in a single routing table for the multiple peer
addresses.
I have checked in support for FIB support in
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/284515
This is a single fib per socket. This way you can have multiple applications on
a single host using SCTP and they can have individual setups. Better than the
current
situation.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.