Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 21:59:02 +0100 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?=" <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> To: "Ivan Voras" <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Porting from Linux to FreeBSD (procfs question) Message-ID: <1bd550a00801031259q56965b82n86a050f945a5df3d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <fljhvi$8j9$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <1bd550a00801030926h7b3f0aaayfd04244a3305619c@mail.gmail.com> <86tzlud6y5.fsf@ds4.des.no> <1bd550a00801031157s521665e4p77b2250d3966ec1d@mail.gmail.com> <fljhvi$8j9$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 3, 2008 9:53 PM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: > Fernando Apestegu=EDa wrote: > > > Maybe a mix of both could be good: use the linxprocfs when it is > > almost straightforward (in fact I could run the app, just changing few > > lines) and sysctl when the linprocfs doesn't provide the information > > that I need. > > Also, linprocfs is never mounted by default - this might or might not be > an obstacle, depending on how user-friendly the application is (asking > desktop users to alter their fstabs may be asking too much :) ). > I hadn't thought about it... but it's quite to the point. Maybe it makes no sense to ask for a particular filesystem from a graphical Gnome application... > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1bd550a00801031259q56965b82n86a050f945a5df3d>