Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 11:17:55 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@bellavista.cz> To: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount(8) mount_union(8) and the slippery wet floor... Message-ID: <20020905091754.GE10717@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> In-Reply-To: <44y9ahecn2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020904132723.00bc28e8@mail.lusidor.nu> <20020904124832.GA15994@submonkey.net> <44y9ahecn2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com / 2002-09-04 16:13:53 -0400:
> Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:46:42PM +0200, Jimmy Lantz wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > My question is:
> > > Is the mount union mentioned in MOUNT(8) also affected by the
> > > slippery wet floor in MOUNT_UNION(8)??
> > > Or can I safely use the mount with the option union?
> >
> > They are the same thing.
>
> For the record, they are *not* the same thing.
could you elaborate?
--
begin 666 nonexistent.vbs
FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE
11:17AM up 15 days, 17:09, 10 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.03, 0.01
end
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020905091754.GE10717>