From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 23 04:13:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B1F16A421 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 04:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ggm@apnic.net) Received: from mint.apnic.net (mint.apnic.net [202.12.29.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C18913C48C for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 04:13:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ggm@apnic.net) Received: from asmtp.apnic.net (s102.GtokyoFL12.vectant.ne.jp [222.228.213.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mint.apnic.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0A1D5F36; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:13:10 +1000 (EST) Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:13:09 +1000 From: George Michaelson To: "Bruce M. Simpson" Message-ID: <20070623141309.76f4e3be@garlique.algebras.org> In-Reply-To: <467C5DC2.1060109@FreeBSD.org> References: <20070620094806.3a95ec40@garlique.algebras.org> <20070622011451.GA3170@rogue.navcom.lan> <467C5DC2.1060109@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386--netbsdelf) X-Fruit-Of-The-Month-Club: persimmon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, ghozzy Subject: Re: how do you bring IPv6 live without reboot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 04:13:14 -0000 On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:39:46 +0100 "Bruce M. Simpson" wrote: > The fact that it does work at all is to do with how protocol domain > attach works with struct ifnet. I am thinking that in future a lot of > this should change, in order to avoid a number of issues we currently > have -- this (the inability to re-attach IPv6 without taking down the > entire interface) is one of them. > > BMS > its interesting that when I sent-pr'd this, I got tut-tutted back to freebsd questions. In my books, not being able to do this kind of V6 maintenance work on the interface without taking it down probably deserves to be kept as an open bug! -G