From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Apr 29 05:00:18 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id FAA23343
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 29 Apr 1995 05:00:18 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA23298
          ; Sat, 29 Apr 1995 04:59:59 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.9/8.6.9) id EAA01009; Sat, 29 Apr 1995 04:59:47 -0700
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 1995 04:59:47 -0700
Message-Id: <199504291159.EAA01009@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: gpalmer@freefall.cdrom.com
CC: jkh@time.cdrom.com, jfieber@cs.smith.edu, doc@freefall.cdrom.com,
        ports@freefall.cdrom.com
In-reply-to: <20171.799093086@freefall.cdrom.com> (gpalmer@freefall.cdrom.com)
Subject: Re: xhtml editor available..
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=)
Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * In message <7317.799090001@time.cdrom.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes:
 * >I'm willing to move it..  What does the rest of ports think?  I was
 * >truly fishing on this one!
 * 
 * I think editors...
 * 
 * Satoshi?

Gee, people calling from everywhere while I'm at a concert! ;)

Anyway, yeah, I think editors is fine for now.  However, we probably
need to make a new category "www" or "html" or something, ports/net is
getting pretty full these days.  Then xhtml should go there too.

We should do something with x11 too, it's getting pretty painful to
manage.

Satoshi