From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 06:19:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6EF16A41C for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 06:19:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A7D43D53 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 06:19:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 2874 invoked by uid 510); 23 Jun 2005 06:19:25 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.85/888. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.8/5.0):. Processed in 2.436843 secs); 23 Jun 2005 06:19:25 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-1.8/5.0):. Processed in 2.436843 secs Process 2867) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 23 Jun 2005 06:19:22 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1119507562.2601.3.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 06:19:22 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Need your advise. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 06:19:29 -0000 On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 20:39, Charles Swiger wrote: > On Jun 22, 2005, at 4:22 PM, Nuttapon Tharachaikul wrote: > > Please advise me , I would like to know that : Does BSD5.4 > > support "High Availability Clustering" same like RedHatAS3.0 ? In > > term of the capability to handle share disk-storage to support > > redundancy of fail over single point of failure, that if one server > > fail then another one can be promote to handle application service > > by share disk-storage in a middle. > > Hmm. The answer is probably no, FreeBSD doesn't have anything which > handles NFS or Samba failover transparently. Chuck, Sorry to disagree. There is a port of Heartbeat to free BSD, (it is in the ports). It does handle NFS and Samba failover transparently. In fact it will handle almost anything that you can start and stop via a script. Rob