From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 6 19:40:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A6A5106566B for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 19:40:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD6D8FC14 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 19:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q06Je5St024254 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 19:40:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q06Je5WD024253; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 19:40:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 19:40:05 GMT Message-Id: <201201061940.q06Je5WD024253@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Jason Helfman Cc: Subject: Re: ports/163866: New Port: security/tsshbatch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jason Helfman List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:40:06 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/163866; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jason Helfman To: Tim Daneliuk Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/163866: New Port: security/tsshbatch Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 11:29:27 -0800 Thank you for your contribution, but I did have one question regarding your submission. Is there anything different with this utility compared to security/mussh? Thanks! -jgh -- Jason Helfman | FreeBSD Committer jgh@FreeBSD.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh