From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Mar 11 21:10: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586AA37B71A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:10:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f2C5A2J31785; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:10:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:10:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200103120510.f2C5A2J31785@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Mike Heffner Subject: RE: ports/25717: Update to xforms port Reply-To: Mike Heffner Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/25717; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mike Heffner To: andrew@ugh.net.au Cc: gena@NetVision.net.il, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ports/25717: Update to xforms port Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:06:46 -0500 (EST) Xforms has been downgraded from 0.89 -> 0.88 because .89 is very buggy. Is there a specific feature of .89 that is needed? On 12-Mar-2001 andrew@ugh.net.au wrote: | |>Number: 25717 |>Category: ports |>Synopsis: Update to xforms port |>Confidential: no |>Severity: non-critical |>Priority: medium |>Responsible: freebsd-ports |>State: open |>Quarter: |>Keywords: |>Date-Required: |>Class: change-request |>Submitter-Id: current-users |>Arrival-Date: Sun Mar 11 17:10:00 PST 2001 |>Closed-Date: |>Last-Modified: |>Originator: Andrew |>Release: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386 |>Organization: | UgH! |>Environment: | | | |>Description: | | Update of xforms for from 0.88 -> 0.89. | -- Mike Heffner Blacksburg, VA http://filebox.vt.edu/users/mheffner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message