From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Aug 6 11:01:45 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA03976 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 11:01:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA03961 for ; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 11:01:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA13648; Tue, 6 Aug 1996 10:58:21 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199608061758.KAA13648@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Announcing CVSup: Intelligent SUP Replacement To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Tue, 6 Aug 1996 10:58:21 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, jdp@polstra.com In-Reply-To: <199608060639.IAA09022@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Aug 6, 96 08:39:32 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > OK, what about revision history? > > > > Speaking of history, the cvs log files might represent a problem. I > > hadn't thought about them. > > You don't need to write into them locally. The CVS on freefall has > tweaked scripts to leave the information there. I meant the revision history of the files in a local branch when they are integrated into the main line tree ...or doesn't the main line tree need the revision history from the contributor? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.