Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:48:29 +0100 From: "Martin Hepworth" <maxsec@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large File System? Message-ID: <72cf361e0608100248l4d27b74fs7d34f58288805d9c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <44D9D208.9080505@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <df9ac37c0608071513n7fdfc928r9d1aa3b9e8edfaec@mail.gmail.com> <ygfzmegm97g.fsf@dominion.borderworlds.dk> <df9ac37c0608071636j2f28bc6en66e985d528e8d85f@mail.gmail.com> <eeef1a4c0608080117r22d05716x1e623dd6ee2cf573@mail.gmail.com> <72cf361e0608081151p68feb6b2lf8badd518cf46a9c@mail.gmail.com> <ef10de9a0608090426i5539b279y76e0e2865adb372c@mail.gmail.com> <44D9D208.9080505@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hmm I wonder what the advantages of this over softupdates are. Never really saw the need for the google summer of code project etc for this when we have softupdates.... But I guess I must be missing something.... -- martin On 8/9/06, Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > > Nikolas Britton wrote: > > > You've never had to fsck a 2TB+ array, have you?... This is why we > > DEMAND journaling UFS2..... or ZFS. > > Ask and ye shall receive. > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2006-August/064932.html > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > Kent, CT11 9PW > > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?72cf361e0608100248l4d27b74fs7d34f58288805d9c>