Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 00:54:49 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, Maxime Henrion <mux@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: duplicate -ffreestanding in kernel build Message-ID: <3D0D95C9.70210E62@mindspring.com> References: <20020617150426.W3371-100000@gamplex.bde.org> <3D0D8788.D668B2C0@mindspring.com> <20020617073924.GA12276@falcon.midgard.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Erik Trulsson wrote: > As for documentation I suggest you read the documentation for the > -ffreestanding and -fnobuiltin options in gcc. > (And read up on the "as-if" rule in the Standard.) I read it. It did not specifically state that it made this assumption, from what I could read. I read both the man and info pages. I asked this before: am I missing some documentation, here? > > I think I'm going to be sick. > > Why? Because your assumptions turned out to be merely assumptions and > not facts? Because (as Mark Valentine said): "It means you can't futz with the implementation of the standard library in a standard way." Does "-nostdlib" imply "turn the printf/puts conversions off, thanks"? Assuming you can substitute one standard library function for another in certain cases really should be more or less predicated on your having the standard library functions in scope for the link, right? -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D0D95C9.70210E62>