From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 12 16:12:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A75E16A400 for ; Sat, 12 May 2007 16:12:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stom@free.fr) Received: from smtp2-g19.free.fr (smtp2-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008B613C465 for ; Sat, 12 May 2007 16:12:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stom@free.fr) Received: from btn.mine.nu (tok69-1-82-67-36-224.fbx.proxad.net [82.67.36.224]) by smtp2-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1387396A2F; Sat, 12 May 2007 18:12:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by btn.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C3947CC3; Sat, 12 May 2007 17:09:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from btn.mine.nu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (btn.mine.nu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NWsWKjrPPXdb; Sat, 12 May 2007 17:09:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.30.10] (88-137-169-58.adslgp.cegetel.net [88.137.169.58]) by btn.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF1447CC0; Sat, 12 May 2007 17:09:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4645E752.5080900@free.fr> Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 18:12:02 +0200 From: Philippe Laquet User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michel Talon References: <20070512152116.GA15207@lpthe.jussieu.fr> In-Reply-To: <20070512152116.GA15207@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any FBSD Filesystem with Mandatory Locks? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 16:12:10 -0000 Michel Talon a écrit : > Philippe Laquet wrote: > > >> OK - Thanks Tom, I will take a look on it, I think that HAVP was first >> developped on and for GNU/Linux, that may explain the need of a >> Mandatory (derived from SysV?) locks... I am currently looking on the >> source code of HAVP and check is a FreeBSD Patch could be done. >> > > I have looked at HAVP CVS, apparently they have added an option to > compile without mandatory locks (NOMAND). > > > Salut Michel ;) That's what I was looking for (Mandatory option in order to perform STREAM). Without Mandatory HAVP works fine but for client "performance" or latency while displaying web pages - I was begging if anyone has found a solution for activating Mandatory locking (+STREAM) for AVP. I am not sure that Mandatory itself is required, HAVP only creates a temporary file but check if the dedicated mount point IS mounted with MAND... (I am afraid I am not really clear... lol) A++ ;)