Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:52:30 +1000
From:      Robert Backhaus <robbak@gmail.com>
To:        Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 5.2 -> 5.3 without single mode?
Message-ID:  <d44995804112818521d0ea99@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <41AA745E.3070400@math.missouri.edu>
References:  <02a201c4d2b7$451a82f0$cbc1a10a@Curs3> <E1CXK4m-0006Je-00._pppp-mail-ru@f21.mail.ru> <20041128.174946.105188774.imp@bsdimp.com> <41AA745E.3070400@math.missouri.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In general, yes, there will be. Quite an extensive one. Usually
thoroughly bikeshedded on the lists beforehand.

As a rule, always do installkernel before installworld. The new kernel
will always run the old world (within reason), although often not vice
versa. Then, in case of a failure, it should always come back up.


On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:59:10 -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <snippage>
> 
> So if there is a new common system call introduced, will it arrive with
> a nice entry in UPDATING plus a HEADS UP?
> 
> Stephen



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d44995804112818521d0ea99>