From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 16 23:35:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121881065689 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:35:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+2Y=2c6cacb6@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F3B8FC0A for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:35:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+2Y=2c6cacb6@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD8FD0B9C for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:35:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:35:10 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20081017003510.3422e7ea@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20081016114348.GA8970@icarus.home.lan> References: <831334.93256.qm@web56806.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <1224138644.3458.97.camel@laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au> <1224156544.3458.104.camel@laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20081016114348.GA8970@icarus.home.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: How to get my Dad's Win2k system to access internet through my FreeBSD 6.2 system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:35:16 -0000 On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:43:48 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > What Michael's describing is a feature many DSL modems offer. There > is no official term for what it is, They are commonly referred to as half-bridge modems. > The reason this feature is HIGHLY desired is because not all PPPoE > implementations are compatible with an ISPs implementation. Even more so if you have PPPoA with no, or poorly-supported, PPPoE.