From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Aug 14 20:08:45 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA02670 for isp-outgoing; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 20:08:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linus.intrastar.net (root@linus.intrastar.net [206.136.25.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA02665 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 20:08:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fixed.intrastar.net (jakes@fixed.intrastar.net [206.136.25.69]) by linus.intrastar.net (8.8.7/LinusIntrastarNet) with ESMTP id WAA04736; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 22:07:14 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <33F3C879.AC7828DA@linus.intrastar.net> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 22:09:46 -0500 From: Jacob Suter X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" CC: "Randy A. Katz" , Jim Dixon , dennis , Edwin Culp , "Daniel O'Callaghan" , isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Multi-homed - Load Balancing - No Single Point of Failure X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: <3022.871608249@time.cdrom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Too expensive... but isn't there a way to do two ethernet networks on small subnets to a single FreeBSD box and two low end (IE Livingston OFfice Routers) to do BGP? I'd rock if it did because you could always settle back to a single line (on your normal ethernet) if something went wrong.... Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > What are you guys using for T1 cards and/or routers to do > Multi-homing & > > load balancing and no single point of failure? > > Go buy some Cisco equipment. :) > > Jordan