From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 11:43:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C7716A4CE; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:43:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D42B43D4C; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:43:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 0A9DE530A; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:43:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 598365308; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:43:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id DEE6833C9A; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:43:04 +0100 (CET) To: obrien@FreeBSD.org References: <200401151015.i0FAF49u009868@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040115111219.GA20914@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20040115101021.L71463@root.org> <20040115191108.GB3693@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040115193214.GC3693@dragon.nuxi.com> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:43:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20040115193214.GC3693@dragon.nuxi.com> (David O'Brien's message of "Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:32:14 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: ss X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.61 cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Nate Lawson Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern init_main.c kern_descrip.c sys_pipe.c uipc_syscalls.c uipc_usrreq.c vfs_syscalls.c src/sys/sys filedesc.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:43:16 -0000 "David O'Brien" writes: > No. Isn't that your responsibility committing new code to use existing > API's when there isn't a good reason not to use them? Only when they are well designed and well implemented, or at least well established. This one isn't. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no