From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 21:32:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3FFF5B8 for ; Tue, 20 May 2014 21:32:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com (mail-pa0-f44.google.com [209.85.220.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F8DC2601 for ; Tue, 20 May 2014 21:32:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id ld10so697397pab.17 for ; Tue, 20 May 2014 14:32:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=ECUoslPJ7va35a0q7hVgRu3Jbc9+tYrBc5b4jEJhf20=; b=TySFDMwpjyZ49IMUPsI7eluBfhuvyirm1OEr41TG2UHU2dxgZwAFRbNaBsX24dJ48n hb3zSjAoYt1msLZ+vS4hrTVfsspdlHBcIZ70El9S7U2PiHecRl1POYW1gxEGfaC89GGL q4YiJm0+19A3ji8RWi/uyvh6V98/gQOc0M15kNLXl1uw/YhfgVcc6Na6LFGp/toC6LiP WsWHDCkVzVEBufeM5TVGXgiJyXPml2iMR5IllaK/VGefwEi2s0IrDQO77OVobGNG00f9 mm2FFSqee9hv7o+A39KNlfDLJc8HwMLS7APVlhEyULCo18ihgMFEzAzr6KYFMoUbKvTa DGTw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl9AzA7G0+G5Kq5lFUwohFqnmMLXinE6KuWUa3lq1ZVA9TWvLeRQIrRTp5/KgxOq21Mvba+ X-Received: by 10.68.237.67 with SMTP id va3mr2832362pbc.19.1400621052428; Tue, 20 May 2014 14:24:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.64.26.239] (dc1-prod.netflix.com. [69.53.236.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fe2sm4671483pbc.68.2014.05.20.14.24.10 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 20 May 2014 14:24:11 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Warner Losh Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_216FFB48-D7B4-44E3-84B8-86CF13715719"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) Subject: Re: svn commit: r266349 - in head: share/mk sys/conf From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: <20140520212004.GU43976@funkthat.com> Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 15:24:05 -0600 Message-Id: References: <201405172031.s4HKVY51073386@svn.freebsd.org> <20140518205605.70159532@bender.Home> <20140520211423.GT43976@funkthat.com> <20140520212004.GU43976@funkthat.com> To: John-Mark Gurney X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers , Warner Losh , Andrew Turner X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 21:32:24 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_216FFB48-D7B4-44E3-84B8-86CF13715719 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On May 20, 2014, at 3:20 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Warner Losh wrote this message on Tue, May 20, 2014 at 15:16 -0600: >>=20 >> On May 20, 2014, at 3:14 PM, John-Mark Gurney = wrote: >>=20 >>> Andrew Turner wrote this message on Sun, May 18, 2014 at 20:56 = +0100: >>>> On Sat, 17 May 2014 20:31:34 +0000 (UTC) >>>> Warner Losh wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> Author: imp >>>>> Date: Sat May 17 20:31:34 2014 >>>>> New Revision: 266349 >>>>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/266349 >>>>>=20 >>>>> Log: >>>>> The time is not yet ripe to break the lack of dependencies between >>>>> src/sys and the rest of the tree for builds. >>>>> o eliminate including bsd.mkopts.mk for the moment in kern.opts.mk >>>>> o No need to include src.opts.mk at all anymore. The reasons for = it >>>>> are now coverted in sys.mk and src.sys.mk. >>>>=20 >>>> This breaks ARM kernel builds as MK_ARM_EABI is undefined, at least = on >>>> 9.x. The below patch fixes it for me. >>>=20 >>> But isn't armeb's ABI OABI on 9? so defaulting this to yes would = change >>> the ABI as you build on 9.x wouldn't it? Or am I just confused by = your >>> throwing in 9.x into the mix? >>=20 >> First, this is current only. >>=20 >> Second, I?m not changing the ABI on 9. >>=20 >> Third, building 9.x armeb binaries is unaffected by the host compiler = and build environment. It will continue to be what it was last week or = last month independent of my changes. >=20 > Oh, I think Andy was complaining about building -HEAD on 9.x, not = about > building 9.x ARM... Then this change makes more sense and as you = said, > isn't changing the ABI on 9... >=20 > Ok, if that's the case, the confusion has been cleared... Yea, that issue has been corrected. The new build system didn=92t define = something, and 9.x was incidental=85 Warner --Apple-Mail=_216FFB48-D7B4-44E3-84B8-86CF13715719 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTe8f1AAoJEGwc0Sh9sBEA4JwQAK5ul3bSDzMW6LlrIUT43kMz CKq1RgkTCzkANeXX5IEB5pH2txbrXi7UUFxXO24RliltlTVlt85pja7t6hnofn2g Q8tzEmbu4DFzVjCOxDqof80FTBMP46d1bGwV9cWqDuHPaAOpMZ/Jnn17hKJIfcqR 1OpuetQK9zLOdt5SvKME3bJajTki1MWY6naZxngg9+IIBJw98TYTiB159+ImYGOl q/AolLnCccq4NS6Tl89KtpanOM2p+xYezPJY3tN+EuEdzHVgE6GJv5BiZ3TdvqZv uvQNOy8Ai9BermjEbgjO3MLzO5yw++S/c5bS21MY8EVIb3VFMP8XyNSTJFXfNbZk CiCJIl9r0EYFmhKcXrewnCrJIEV1H/YasfzuGyt5eBmChdKnbDn8mh0oF6VUtiq6 gwAnPz2J0IYnwwSiCHPqr0XvbQlKOOLefnz57AERU8KmrKAxZjn3RUEj7swEEjT0 9MYJ+Y+mqfv70nFGifMnBQzUGN3PFXrkQeFP4pIBpqh6frVLfq47SHGU37kMpX7J YcLhedqUL++KYAbuHc78im7IUohMfyi+Qy4IjONO6Iqer1LFBMLrMMFvvqXYV0SM ZXsojRRm4Rv4lm8PkOKU4DodsHJn5ysRSE+bA0HXRZ2/YcFhVmSBMEMJgszA9P33 vcOYNSDyzT+EIgWHPvGj =YDi+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_216FFB48-D7B4-44E3-84B8-86CF13715719--