Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:33 GMT From: Jan Henrik Sylvester <me@janh.de> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/164029: [PATCH] graphics/bmeps fix build with databases/gdbm Message-ID: <201201130000.q0D00XA7010082@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/164029; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jan Henrik Sylvester <me@janh.de> To: Rob Farmer <rfarmer@predatorlabs.net> Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/164029: [PATCH] graphics/bmeps fix build with databases/gdbm Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:35:39 +0100 On 01/13/2012 00:07, Rob Farmer wrote: > But, the build doesn't actually fail because we only build bmeps, > which shouldn't need databases or snmp. Can you ignore the message and > continue, or does it completely fail? What do you mean with "the build doesn't actually fail"? cd /usr/ports/graphics/bmeps/ make fails (on 9.0-RELEASE/amd64 with current ports tree and databases/gdbm installed) with the error message you got, too, and additionally this: ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to rfarmer@predatorlabs.net [maintainer] and attach the "/usr/ports/graphics/bmeps/work/dktools-2.2.22/config.log" including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/bmeps. I do not know how to ignore this. Tools dealing with ports consider this a build failure. Yes, I can got to work/dktools-2.2.22/ and run make successfully, but this is not how ports are supposed to be used. Since you say that bmeps does not actually use databases, my patch will do not harm, but fix the build (of the port). Have I misunderstood you? Cheers, Jan Henrik
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201201130000.q0D00XA7010082>