Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Mar 2021 17:25:13 +0000
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>
To:        Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net>
Cc:        ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r569556 - head/www/squid3
Message-ID:  <20210330172513.GA75131@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <YGNL/%2BwJCwBFxRM3@elch.exwg.net>
References:  <202103301342.12UDgWn2000814@repo.freebsd.org> <YGNL/%2BwJCwBFxRM3@elch.exwg.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 06:04:15PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## Alexey Dokuchaev (danfe@FreeBSD.org):
> > Subject: svn commit: r569556 - head/www/squid3
> 
> Given that upstream does not release updates to the 3.5 series anymore
> since about three years and our port does not have the security patches
> which upstream kindly included in their advisories (patches for
> SQUID-2018:4 and SQUID-2020:3 are definitively missing and I guess
> everything in between, too - and from SQUID-2020:4 on, upstream did not
> provide 3.5-series patches with the advisories): how much do we need the
> old squid at all?

Apparently we do, since I was asked on @freebsd_ru telegram chat to unbreak
it.  According to the users' reports, Squid 4.x is a memory hog and buggy.

./danfe



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20210330172513.GA75131>