From owner-freebsd-security Mon May 6 13:32:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from leaf.lumiere.net (leaf.lumiere.net [208.44.192.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002FA37B40C for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 13:32:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by leaf.lumiere.net (Postfix, from userid 1082) id 09626CD25; Sun, 5 May 2002 02:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 02:10:16 -0700 From: Derrick John Klise To: "William J. Borskey" Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw Message-ID: <20020505021016.A84006@leaf.lumiere.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from wborskey@hotmail.com on Sat, May 04, 2002 at 08:36:52PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 08:36:52PM -0700, William J. Borskey wrote: > > is it possible to write rules for ipfw using ethernet addresses instead of > ip addresses? > I haven't used it, and I'm not sure it's stable, but: http://www.bsdshell.net/hut_ethfw.html is a possibility if you want to do ethernet-based filtering. -- Derrick John Klise "I went into a general store, and they wouldn't sell me anything specific". -- Steven Wright To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message