From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 24 18:14:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDEA106564A for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:14:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adaugherity@tamu.edu) Received: from vpr-mailsrv1.tamu.edu (vpr-mailsrv1.tamu.edu [165.91.114.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A30D8FC20 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:14:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adaugherity@tamu.edu) Received: from vpr-groupwise-domain-MTA by vpr-mailsrv1.tamu.edu with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:54:09 -0500 Message-Id: <48DA385B.2389.00F2.0@vprmail.tamu.edu> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.2 HP Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:53:47 -0500 From: "Andrew Daugherity" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: feasibility of updating databases/mysql41-server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:14:43 -0000 I still have a server running mysql 4.1.22, and it's marked as having the = "MyISAM table privileges secuity [sic] bypass vulnerability". According = to CVE-2008-2079 (linked from portaudit), this is fixed in 4.1.24. I was going to file a PR asking for an update to 4.1.24, but then I = discovered that MySQL 4.1 is in the "extended support" phase where they = aren't releasing tarballs any more (and of course no binaries). The = source *is* still available, but it's in the bazaar repo (see: http://blogs= .sun.com/datacharmer/entry/hidden_jevewls_in_mysql_bazaar ). This can be = checked out and built, but having a build-dep of bzr is probably not = wanted. Is it feasible (both license-wise and technically) to have a mirror of a = 4.1.24 bzr checkout in tarball form somewhere, so the port can be built? Thanks, Andrew