From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 15 22:17:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8680A16A41A for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:17:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09ED743D45 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:17:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:17:45 -0400 id 00056403.4491DC89.00012DE2 Received: from Internal Mail-Server by mx01 (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 15 Jun 2006 18:10:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:17:44 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: RW Message-Id: <20060615181744.16c98c69.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <200606152221.53951.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> References: <4491B615.1080704@gregs-garage.com> <4491B9DD.6090707@gregs-garage.com> <20060615160250.a52d37c6.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <200606152221.53951.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.6 (GTK+ 2.8.19; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: clarification of cvsup process. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:17:47 -0000 In response to RW : > On Thursday 15 June 2006 21:02, Bill Moran wrote: > > > Are you sure you completed the process successfully? If you'd had > > tag=., this would reports something like 6-STABLE. If you'd had > > 6_0_RELENG, it would report 6.0-RELEASE-p9. > > Surely tag=. is 7-CURRENT, not 6-STABLE. Or am I missing something? My mistake. My point doesn't change. Based on his supfile, he should have 7 or 6-p9, but not the version he reported. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc.