From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Aug 19 10: 2:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from misha.cisco.com (misha.cisco.com [171.69.206.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDCD51511C for ; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 10:02:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mi@misha.cisco.com) Received: (from mi@localhost) by misha.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id NAA19413 for stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 13:01:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi) Message-Id: <199908191701.NAA19413@misha.cisco.com> Subject: bison is being built with no optimization? To: stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 13:01:59 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: mi@aldan.algebra.com From: Mikhail Teterin X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL60 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It seems, the bison is built with no optimization. Is that an intended behaviour, or simply a missing plus sign its Makefile's CFLAGS= -DHAVE_CONFIG_H ? -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message