From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 25 8:54:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from kweetal.tue.nl (kweetal.tue.nl [131.155.2.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B34537BD62 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 08:54:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcov@toad.stack.nl) Received: from hermes.tue.nl [131.155.2.46] by kweetal.tue.nl (8.9.3) for id RAA14120 (ESMTP); Tue, 25 Apr 2000 17:54:45 +0200 (MDT) Received: from deathstar (n140.dial.tue.nl [131.155.209.139]) by hermes.tue.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2542E805 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 17:54:43 +0200 (CEST) From: "Marco van de Voort" To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 17:52:36 +0100 Subject: Re: Multithreaded server performance In-reply-to: <20000424150052.J31925@sturm.canonware.com> References: <20000424164405.G370@seaman.org>; from dick@seaman.org on Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 04:44:05PM -0500 X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b) Message-Id: <20000425155443.CF2542E805@hermes.tue.nl> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Linux runs into problems at less than 4000 threads because of a limit on > the total number of processes, even if the thread stack size is decreased. 16xxx if you use a 2.3.99pre-x kernel? At least I thought that that was being mentioned as one of the major new things in 2.4.x kernels. Marco van de Voort (MarcoV@Stack.nl) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message