Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2024 14:42:51 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 281584] [NEW PORT] net/dhcrelay: OpenBSD dhcrelay daemons as an ISC alternative Message-ID: <bug-281584-7788-krBv7HmoPe@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-281584-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-281584-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D281584 Robert Clausecker <fuz@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org |ports@FreeBSD.org CC| |fuz@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Robert Clausecker <fuz@FreeBSD.org> --- Looking good! Could you perhaps edit pkg-descr a little to explain what advantages the OpenBSD dhcrelay brings over the ISC one? An explanation of DHCP is not re= ally needed in pkg-descr, so do focus on what would make a user interested in th= is port in particular. A build test fails in the install phase: install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 dhcrelay /usr/home/ports/main.ports/net/dhcrelay/work/stage/usr/local/sbin/dhcrelay install: /usr/home/ports/main.ports/net/dhcrelay/work/stage/usr/local/sbin/dhcrelay: chown/chgrp: Operation not permitted *** Error code 71 You probably need USES=3Duidfix. Use DISTVERSION over PORTVERSION if possible. I see that your upstream is that of a custom fork. Is there an official upstream? Would it be possible to rewrite the port to use the official upstream? We strongly prefer drawing from the true upstream over some rand= om repositories that tend to end up being unmaintained. Please check these issues and resubmit. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-281584-7788-krBv7HmoPe>