From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 02:56:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A4516A4CE for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 02:56:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outside.taborandtashell.net (sub18-33.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.18.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F8143D68 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 02:56:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net) Received: (qmail 53477 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2004 18:56:33 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.9?) (tkelly@192.168.0.9) by 192.168.0.2 with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 8 Dec 2004 18:56:33 -0800 Message-ID: <41B7BEEE.2000601@taborandtashell.net> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 18:56:46 -0800 From: Tabor Kelly User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041112) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Native Java JDK vs. Linux Java JDK via emulation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 02:56:40 -0000 Hello Again, First of all, I checked (http://www.freebsd.org/java/), but it did not have the info I was looking for (it also didn't seem to have any contact info for their authors). So, my question: What is the difference between the Native Java JDK (java/jdk14), and the linux one (java/linux-sun-jdk14), besides the obvious fact that java/linux-sun-jdk14 is officially sanctioned by Sun? Also, if java/jdk14 is a native binary build of Java, why does it require java/linux-sun-jdk14? Finally, a more general question: why do ports require specific versions of java? For example: The OpenOffice port requires java/jdk-1.4.2p6_7, shouldn't any vendor's copy of version 1.4 of the JDK work? Thank You, Tabor Kelly