From nobody Mon Apr 3 17:29:42 2023 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PqyZJ62Zqz432v6; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 17:29:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from diizzy@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net (relay11.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PqyZJ2nCCz4LV2; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 17:29:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from diizzy@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: (Authenticated sender: daniel.engberg@pyret.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7886F100003; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 17:29:42 +0000 (UTC) List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 19:29:42 +0200 From: Daniel Engberg To: Gleb Popov Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 93eaa5412bfc - main - security/howdy: Face recognition based authentication provider. In-Reply-To: References: <202304031415.333EFmQx016670@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <998481bfbf4a242146f9d783a5831e4b@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: X-Sender: diizzy@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4PqyZJ2nCCz4LV2 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:29169, ipnet:217.70.176.0/20, country:FR] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 2023-04-03 18:59, Gleb Popov wrote: > On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 7:03 PM Daniel Engberg > wrote: >> >> >> The referenced commit doesn't define a version so either Example 16 or >> possibly Example 19 (some prefer the latter) should be used. >> >> On top of that, PORTVERSION --> DISTVERSION and GH_TAGNAME should use >> a >> short hash >> >> Best regards, >> Daniel >> > > Yes, I agree. The 'beta' branch seems to have a little in common with > the last tag, so probably just appending 20230306 is more correct? Example 16 uses "1.3.0.a.20140411" as example so I say b.upstreamcommitdate would be more correct indeeed. Best regards, Daniel