From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 3 08:13:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E94106566B for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:13:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from andxor.it (relay.andxor.it [195.223.2.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 916D48FC19 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 08:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64407 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2012 08:13:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO alex.andxor.it) (192.168.2.30) by andxor.it with SMTP; 3 Apr 2012 08:13:47 -0000 Message-ID: <4F7AB13B.9030208@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 10:13:47 +0200 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120315 Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: bouncycastle poll X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 08:13:49 -0000 Brief history: BouncyCastle 1.45 is the last release implementing APIv1. BC 1.46 and 1.47 are preliminary releases for next BC 2.0 that implement APIv2. The APIs are incompatible (and conflicting) and we need to keep both versions in the ports tree. Possible solutions: 1) repocopy java/bouncycastle into java/bouncycastle145 and update the former to 1.47 (and later to 2.0) 2) repocopy java/bouncycastle into java/bouncycastle1 and update the former to 1.47 (and later to 2.0) 3) repocopy java/bouncycastle into java/bouncycastle2 and update the latter to 1.47 (and later to 2.0) Which one do you prefer? -- Alex Dupre