Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Sep 2000 10:39:06 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>
To:        Andrew Boothman <andrew@cream.org>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>, olgeni@uli.it, ruslan@shevchenko.kiev.ua, seb@bluetail.com, Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org, Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>, doc@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com
Subject:   Re: erlang port -- a poster child (Re: I'll be rolling a 4.1.1 r
Message-ID:  <200009201439.e8KEdli71369@aldan.algebra.com>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.000920031025.andrew@cream.org> from Andrew Boothman at "Sep 20, 2000 03:10:25 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew Boothman once stated:

=* If  the PR  is for  a port  make sure  that "port  update" is  in the
=synopsis field, if only so that it catches Neil Blakey-Milner's regular
=check for such PR's, but also to act as a good description.
=
=* If you are the MAINTAINER of a  piece of code (or more likely a port)
=and don't have  commit privs, put "MAINTAINER update"  in the synopsis,
=for the same reasons as before.

Use  of  synopsis  for  this  worries me.  Perhaps,  this  warrants  two
new  classes: ``update''  and ``maintainer-update''  in addition  to the
all-including ``change-request''?

	-mi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200009201439.e8KEdli71369>