From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 17 19:32:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E504A16A4CE for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:32:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3.server.rpi.edu (smtp3.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857CC43D2F for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 19:32:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp3.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2I3WQLP023416; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:32:26 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <20040314210709.GA6482@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <200403151528.i2FFSe602853@netlx014.civ.utwente.nl> <20040315161833.GA10855@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20040317023908.GA56755@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:32:25 -0500 To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" ; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Check the latest DHCP vs 64-bTT X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 03:32:29 -0000 At 4:08 AM +0100 3/18/04, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: >Garance A Drosihn writes: >> Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: >> > I committed a ton of patches to the port last night, including > > > one that should fix the 64-bit time_t issue. > > > > This is excellent to see. Thanks! Hopefully that will go a long >> way to fixing the problems that people are seeing, and then we >> can get the same fixes into the base-system version. > >well... a bunch of those patches were actually taken from the base >system :) the log message contained a fairly detailed list. Well, I'm confused, but then I haven't been paying close attention to the dhcp issues. Everyone who needs dhcp should try the base-system version, I guess, and let me know if it is now working correctly. It certainly wasn't when I last tested it. If it is working right, I'll remove or reword the special blurb about dhcp in UPDATING.64bTT. If it isn't working right, then check the port and let us know if that works any better. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn =3D gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu