Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:47:27 +0200 From: Antoine Brodin <antoine@FreeBSD.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error: Orphaned: @unexec rmdir "/home" >/dev/null 2>&1 || : (PING) Message-ID: <CAALwa8mSJzzYN=LwBL0nK3MMMukGx4JYOg5othrbBpKxjUBeNQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1406201407010.4149@tuna.site> References: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1406201407010.4149@tuna.site>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> wrote: > [ No ideas? Shall I just file a bug report? ] > > Build with a non-standard PREFIX and LOCALBASE in /home/gerald/10-i386, > make ports builds have been failing with the following for a bit (for > lang/gcc49 among others): > > #### Running regression-test, checking for orphans, checking pkg-plist. > ====> Checking for pkg-plist issues (check-plist) > ===> Parsing plist > ===> Checking for items in STAGEDIR missing from pkg-plist > Error: Orphaned: @unexec rmdir "/home/gerald" >/dev/null 2>&1 || : > Error: Orphaned: @unexec rmdir "/home" >/dev/null 2>&1 || : > > Any ideas what is going on here? And what is adding those interesting > @unexec rmdir entries? > > Either these should not be added, or check-plist should not error out > when seeing them. Hi, You can try to add NO_PREFIX_RMDIR=yes to your port when you test it. Testing PREFIX!=LOCALBASE often produces strange results anyway, in most cases people should test PREFIX=LOCALBASE != /usr/local and not PREFIX!=LOCALBASE. Cheers, Antoine
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAALwa8mSJzzYN=LwBL0nK3MMMukGx4JYOg5othrbBpKxjUBeNQ>