Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 Dec 2003 15:54:23 -0600 (CST)
From:      "Doug Poland" <doug@polands.org>
To:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Postscript printer, serial or parallel cable?
Message-ID:  <4875.172.16.1.35.1072043663.squirrel@email.polands.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

I recently got my hands on a free (woowho!) HP 4050 printer.  I'm
going to hook it up to a FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE server.  The printer has
two serial (one male/one female) connectors, a Centronix port, and
some odd looking port that looks like you plug a mouse into it.

The handbook states that I can use serial or parallel cabling to a
postscript capable printer but there may be some advantage to a serial
cable as it is bi-directional.  I've got several newer IEEE
something-or-another parallel cables lying around unused.   They were
rather expensive and, IIRC, proported to be bi-directional.

Question:  Is a serial hookup preferable to parallel?  As a future
possiblity, this modest FBSD box may become a dedicated print server
with a color laser and ink jet also hanging off it.  I'll probably
install CUPS and "share" it with windows users via Samba.

Thanks for your input

-- 
Regards,
Doug



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4875.172.16.1.35.1072043663.squirrel>