From owner-cvs-all Sun Dec 27 16:01:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA18899 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 16:01:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from opus.cts.cwu.edu (opus.cts.cwu.edu [198.104.92.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA18856 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 16:01:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu) Received: from localhost (skynyrd@localhost) by opus.cts.cwu.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id QAA16576; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 16:01:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 16:01:09 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Timmons To: Mike Smith cc: John Birrell , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC GENERICupgrade SMP-GENERIC In-Reply-To: <199812272339.PAA05690@dingo.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk My own experience with 2.2.6-ish boxes and -current from about two weeks ago has been that the upgrade worked fine. If you can find a way to save some of the upgrade stuff a little longer I think it would be nice :) -Chris On Sun, 27 Dec 1998, Mike Smith wrote: > I'm not quite sure what our response to the 2.2 -> 3.x upgrade path > will be. At the moment, we're having more success with "do a binary > upgrade", because the built upgrade path is littered with corpses. > > There'll definitely be some testing done, but I wouldn't want to commit > to a prognosis at this point. > > I *definitely* feel that all of the upgrade stuff should be removed > from the 3.1 branch as soon as the branch occurs. > > -- > \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith > \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au > \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org > \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message