From owner-cvs-all Sat Dec 7 23: 8:23 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CEB37B401; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 23:08:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from blues.jpj.net (blues.jpj.net [208.210.80.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FFC43EA9; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 23:08:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from trevor@jpj.net) Received: from blues.jpj.net (localhost.jpj.net [127.0.0.1]) by blues.jpj.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gB878EV3000554; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 02:08:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trevor@jpj.net) Received: from localhost (trevor@localhost) by blues.jpj.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id gB878DMQ000550; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 02:08:14 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: blues.jpj.net: trevor owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 02:08:13 -0500 (EST) From: Trevor Johnson To: Marcel Moolenaar Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, , Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/linux_base Makefile distinfo.alpha distinfo.i386 pkg-plist.i386 In-Reply-To: <20021208014146.GA1987@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> Message-ID: <20021208014658.M82142-100000@blues.jpj.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 08:15:49PM -0500, Trevor Johnson wrote: > > > > It sounds as though you plan to implement this in a way which won't create > > duplicates of all the .alpha.rpm and .i386.rpm files. If so, I'm all for > > it. > > There can never be duplication for the arch specific RPMs because > *.alpha.rpm and *.i386.rpm are two independent and seperate sets > of entities. > > The following implements what I suggest: > > Index: Makefile > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/linux_base/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.70 > diff -u -r1.70 Makefile > --- Makefile 3 Dec 2002 06:45:56 -0000 1.70 > +++ Makefile 8 Dec 2002 01:39:36 -0000 > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ > BUILD_DEPENDS= rpm:${PORTSDIR}/archivers/rpm > > ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= alpha i386 > -DIST_SUBDIR= rpm > +DIST_SUBDIR= rpm-${MACHINE_ARCH} Presently all the RPMs exist in the rpm/ directory on the distfile mirrors, CD-ROMs, and in users' private distfile caches. With your patch, users would have to download a second copy of them all (or manually move their distfiles around), and mirrors would have to store a second copy of them all. My rough estimate is that this would take 30 MB of storage space per architecture per linux_base port--on the order of 120 MB for someone who works with both Alpha and i386 and with both linux_base 7.1 and linux_base-6. The original problem was that Red Hat changed the time stamp on one file. I had thought of this solution, but it just seemed too wasteful. > > In the meantime, it would be best if the port were restored to a more > > usable state. IMO its breakage is the greater inconvenience. > > Fair enough. I didn't want to apply the above patch because we're > too close to release to mess with DIST_SUBDIR gratuitously... Thank you. I read you as saying that it's okay to add back the second checksums for the time being, until we come up with something better. If I haven't misunderstood, would you be so kind as to add them back? -- Trevor Johnson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message