From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jul 4 1:36:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from trinity.skynet.be (trinity.skynet.be [195.238.2.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4344137B807; Tue, 4 Jul 2000 01:36:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by trinity.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5D718219; Tue, 4 Jul 2000 10:34:31 +0200 (MET DST) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20000703212151.B94372@argon.gryphonsoft.com> References: <200007020558.HAA71231@gits.dyndns.org> <20000703212151.B94372@argon.gryphonsoft.com> Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 10:11:06 +0200 To: Will Andrews , clefevre@citeweb.net From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: bin/19635: add -c for grand total to df(1), like du(1) does Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 9:21 PM -0400 2000/7/3, Will Andrews wrote: > Does anyone else here think this is a good idea? If you're looking for votes, you've got mine. BTW, will this play nicely with -h? Consider me stupid if you like, but I've recently been re-re-re-re-reading the man pages for df(1), and ran across this option I had never heard of before, and I quite like the way it adaptively summarizes the information. Of course, now that you've got me started, I have to go re-re-re-re-read the du(1) man page, too. ;-) Thanks! -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message