From owner-freebsd-chat Mon May 27 1:44:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from HAL9000.wox.org (as3-4-65.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.196.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD22C37B407 for ; Mon, 27 May 2002 01:44:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.wox.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g4R8hsl02079; Mon, 27 May 2002 01:43:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das) Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 01:43:53 -0700 From: David Schultz To: Terry Lambert Cc: George Reid , pgreen , Rahul Siddharthan , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Language in danger: Language loss Message-ID: <20020527014353.B1951@HAL9000.wox.org> Mail-Followup-To: Terry Lambert , George Reid , pgreen , Rahul Siddharthan , chat@FreeBSD.ORG References: <3CF17486.F06F3E6A@mindspring.com> <20020527005647.A50028@FreeBSD.org> <3CF1CD8C.C3262181@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CF1CD8C.C3262181@mindspring.com>; from tlambert2@mindspring.com on Sun, May 26, 2002 at 11:09:16PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thus spake Terry Lambert : > If you could provide a proof for Goedel's Theorem, it wouldn't > be "Goedel's Theorem", it would be "Goedel's Law". > > Feel free to provide the counter example originally requested. It > would be amusing to see someone find a way to discredit Goedel's > Theorem on a "-chat" mailing list. Eh? What's wrong with Godel's proof for Godel's Theorem? > PS: Prove you aren't a witch... Well, I *do* weigh more than a duck... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message