Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2024 15:14:53 -0700 From: Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com> To: Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: CAN bus support Message-ID: <CAK7dMtA1G6vvN1yVjE-ENh-usof88jDymoHGWKc4YeKB%2B0dcgA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <0100019312f6cb5f-56730680-f87f-4baa-a0e8-8a51d037fabe-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <CAK7dMtC6uFquq1ZBcA3MwZ_4J21JgdaEeF%2B=LY-jAwsroHXy%2BQ@mail.gmail.com> <0100019312f6cb5f-56730680-f87f-4baa-a0e8-8a51d037fabe-000000@email.amazonses.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 9, 2024 at 3:06=E2=80=AFPM Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com= > wrote: > > On 11/9/24 13:57, Kevin Bowling wrote: > > A FreeBSD vendor is interested in interacting with CAN bus on FreeBSD. > > [...] > > Is there other interest or concern about the topic? > > As release engineer, I'm interested in hearing more (perhaps off-list) > about what they're doing, since the time scales for most devices which > use a CAN bus are significantly longer than the time scales for FreeBSD > releases. It is an amd64 appliance with a bus attached controller and not a special SoC so it probably shouldn't be impactful to arch support expectations. > No obligation of course, and they're free to do whatever works for them; > this is purely a case of "knowing more about how FreeBSD is being used > might help us support said uses better". I'll find out some more information and see what is appropriate from their perspective to share. > -- > Colin Percival > FreeBSD Release Engineering Lead & EC2 platform maintainer > Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoi= d >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAK7dMtA1G6vvN1yVjE-ENh-usof88jDymoHGWKc4YeKB%2B0dcgA>