From owner-freebsd-security Wed Apr 25 5:53:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DAB37B422 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 05:53:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rasputin@freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97] ident=root) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #4) id 14sOnO-0000yx-00 for security@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 13:53:26 +0100 Received: (from rasputin@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f3PCquv00931 for security@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2001 13:52:56 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rasputin) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 13:52:56 +0100 From: Rasputin To: security@freebsd.org Subject: IPf fragment fix Message-ID: <20010425135255.A847@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Reply-To: Rasputin Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is the one that was patched in STABLE on the 7th of April, isn't it? http://www.deadly.org/article.php3?sid=20010419234351 So we got a fix 2 weeks before OpenBSD. That's pretty impressive. Just wanted to check before I start ribbing my mate who keeps gloating over the 'secure by default' mantra ;) -- You cannot propel yourself forward by patting yourself on the back. Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns :: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message