Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:06:03 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: which make in freebsd? Message-ID: <xzpk76hr1h0.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20031103140044.GA4241@over-yonder.net> (Matthew D. Fuller's message of "Mon, 3 Nov 2003 08:00:45 -0600") References: <20031102010136.44997855.beyert@cs.ucr.edu> <xzpfzh6apma.fsf@dwp.des.no> <3FA5EC15.2C7F1656@emailrob.com> <xzpznfdeth8.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20031103140044.GA4241@over-yonder.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> writes: > I have a few projects going where I've through sheer cussedness refused > to stop using bmake, but need the impaired folks using Linux systems to > be able to build too, so I've ended up writing scripts to either convert > the Makefile into a GNUmakefile, or scripts to take a proto-Makefile and > convert it to both formats. PITA. I believe you can get a BSD-compatible make(1) as a package on most Linux distros - and if all else fails, NetBSD's make(1) is highly portable and easy to build. It differs a little from ours, but not much. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpk76hr1h0.fsf>