From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 29 16:42:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55CD16A400 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:42:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com) Received: from zig.murex.com (mail.murex.com [194.98.239.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13EB343D7C for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:42:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com) From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Murex North America To: Glenn Dawson Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:41:49 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200603281422.57389.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <200603290917.58586@aldan> <7.0.1.0.2.20060329071519.079c11d8@antimatter.net> In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20060329071519.079c11d8@antimatter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603291644.k2TGiMTg026896@zig.murex.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Mar 2006 16:41:50.0962 (UTC) FILETIME=[ADC66520:01C6534F] Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Derek Ragona Subject: Re: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:42:39 -0000 середа 29 березень 2006 10:28, Glenn Dawson написав: > >= Despite the "No spam,thanks" the message was accepted. > > I don't see anything in the log entries above to indicate that the > message was accepted at all.  What makes you think that it was? First, there was no rejection entry in the maillog. Second -- and most importantly -- I found this particular spam-message in the spam mailbox. Thanks, -mi