Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2019 21:30:03 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239630] x11/libxshmfence: prefer SHM_ANON over mksotemp() Message-ID: <bug-239630-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239630 Bug ID: 239630 Summary: x11/libxshmfence: prefer SHM_ANON over mksotemp() Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Keywords: patch Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: x11@FreeBSD.org Reporter: jbeich@FreeBSD.org CC: x11@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(x11@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: x11@FreeBSD.org Attachment #206257 maintainer-approval?(x11@FreeBSD.org) Flags: CC: x11@FreeBSD.org Created attachment 206257 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D206257&action= =3Dedit v1 (has commit message) SHM_ANON is faster and more similar to memfd_create(). Not bothering to upstream because futex/mksotemp fixes didn't get any feedback after 2 years. Patchwork is complete crap for one-off contributors i.e., those humble enou= gh to not annoy everyone on patch maillist why their contribution wasn't revie= wed yet. libxshmfence is only used by DRI3, so make sure to define LIBGL_DRI3_ENABLE= via environ(7) due to drm-legacy-kmod hacks in mesa-dri and if using xf86-video-intel add Option "DRI" "3" to xorg.conf. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-239630-7788>