From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 24 02:30:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B03F37B401; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 02:30:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (pc1-cdif2-5-cust38.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.101.150.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F7743FAF; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 02:30:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.20) id 19fcQn-000HQ9-L9; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:30:37 +0100 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:30:37 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: "Simon L. Nielsen" Message-ID: <20030724093037.GB46900@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , "Simon L. Nielsen" , Nate Lawson , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org References: <20030723132439.D550137B401@hub.freebsd.org> <20030723102603.O39567@root.org> <20030723204721.GA1886@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9Hhx61DPNOHVwUu9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030723204721.GA1886@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Ceri Davies cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Nate Lawson Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man7 Makefile rescue.7 X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 09:30:40 -0000 --9Hhx61DPNOHVwUu9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:47:22PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2003.07.23 10:26:54 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: >=20 > > What's it doing in section 7? I thought system utils are section 8? >=20 > I thought section 7 was more appropriate, since rescue is not a command > but rather a system. It was also a bit inspired by docs/35011, which > argues that some of the parts of section 8 really should be in section > 7. I'm agreeing with Simon here. This manpage documents the rescue system, not the rescue command, and therefore belongs in section 7. I'm not anywhere near a -CURRENT machine at the moment, but if running $ /rescue/rescue doesn't do anything, then as far as I'm concerned it doesn't belong in section 8. If it does, then a new manpage should be written documenting the command rescue(8) and added to section 8. Ceri --=20 User: DO YOU ACCEPT JESUS CHRIST AS YOUR PERSONAL LORD AND SAVIOR? Iniaes: Sure, I can accept all forms of payment. -- www.chatterboxchallenge.com --9Hhx61DPNOHVwUu9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/H6c9ocfcwTS3JF8RAn5bAJ9nsP0YvD1gtPJRhP7smOY1HVGcugCZAYec ikXYtlkLrSdDAPToouZlllQ= =wkpb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9Hhx61DPNOHVwUu9--