From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jan 1 05:11:25 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id FAA27485 for current-outgoing; Wed, 1 Jan 1997 05:11:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id FAA27480 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 1997 05:11:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from schizo.dk.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP id m0vfQRX-0003vzC; Wed, 1 Jan 97 05:10 PST Received: from critter.dk.tfs.com (critter-home [193.162.32.19]) by schizo.dk.tfs.com (8.8.2/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA25030 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 1997 14:10:49 +0100 (MET) Received: from critter.dk.tfs.com (localhost.phk.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.dk.tfs.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) with ESMTP id OAA12878 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 1997 14:13:36 +0100 (MET) To: current@freebsd.org Subject: and MAKE_SET Reply-to: phk@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 01 Jan 1997 14:13:36 +0100 Message-ID: <12876.852124416@critter.dk.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Isn't it wrong to have MAKE_SET() in ? What if you want to use it from userland ? Is the right solution to have a #ifdef KERNEL section of or is it better to move MAKE_SET() and friends to another header, and in such case, which ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.