Date: Sun, 27 Jul 1997 15:52:50 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu> Cc: peter@spinner.dialix.com.au, max@wide.ad.jp, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/apache Makefile ports/www/apache/filesMakefile Makefile.SSL md5 md5.SSL ports/www/apache/patchespatch-aa patch-ab patch-ac patch-ad patch-ae patch-af patch-agpatch-ah ports/www/apache/patches.SSL patch-aa patch-ab patch-ac ... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970727154803.9015B-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> In-Reply-To: <199707271118.EAA00897@blimp.mimi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 27 Jul 1997, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * I think history is essential for source code tracking, but not for ports > * patches, they change their place too often and commited over completely > * different patches. > > I don't care much about patches, but for Makefiles and checksum files > it is essential for managing the distfiles and packages. Hmm. History for Makefiles - maybe, but md5 is in doubt. Did anybody even try to see history of md5 file? Only mismatches plays role here. In any case, history for ports looks like nitpicking for me... -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@null.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970727154803.9015B-100000>